Hindi 
No products in the cart.
What are the needs of different religions?
According to the psychological school of thought, people turn to religion for comfort and security. According to the sociological school, religion fosters social cohesion and unity.
I am opposed to religions, but not to religion itself. However, that religion is still in its early stages. All of the old faiths will do everything they can to kill it, to destroy it, because the birth of a science of consciousness will be the end of all these so-called religions that have exploited humanity for thousands of years.
It is believed that It can form the foundation for moral views and conduct. It can also foster a sense of belonging and connection to tradition. According to some studies, it may even have an effect on health. Religion's impact on health and life expectancy has long been a difficult topic of study.
The Question is- Is it required to have multiple religions?
In a more educated age, there will be no such thing as religion, only two sciences: objective and subjective science. Subjective science deals with being, while objective science deals with things.
Science investigates the objective world, while religion investigates the subjective world. Their work is identical, yet their directions and dimensions change.
If science is one, why isn't inner science one as well?
True religion, like science, can only be one. There is no Mohammedan, Hindu, or Christian physics; that would be gibberish. But that's exactly what religions have done: they've turned the entire planet insane.
Man only technically respects Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and Mohammedanism, but anyone with any intelligence is no longer interested in such nonsense. He may visit the synagogue, church, and mosque for reasons other than religious; those reasons are social. It pays to be seen in the synagogue; it is polite and causes no damage. It is similar to joining the Rotary Club or the Lions Club. These faiths are old clubs with religious verbiage around them, but if you dig deeper, you will discover that they are all hocus-pocus with no substance inside.
I am against religions, but not against religion itself. However, that religion is still in its early stages of development. All the old faiths will do everything they can to kill it, to destroy it, since the birth of a science of consciousness will be the end of all these so-called religions that have exploited humanity for thousands of years.
What will happen to the churches, synagogues, and temples? What happens to their priests, popes, imams, shankaracharyas, and rabbis? It's big business. And these individuals will not easily enable the true religion to emerge.
However, in human history, the grip of traditional religions is diminishing.
The world has thousands of man-made faiths. This is analogous to man-made boundaries, countries, communities, languages, and so on. All of them were established as a result of the selfish mentality of some humans throughout history who desired to govern and earn wealth.
Consider a planet 5000 years ago with only one language, one country, one dynasty, no religions, no gods, no prayers, no wars, no accidents, no police, no doctor, no court, and so on. Everyone was healthy, happy, and wealthy. This was dubbed heaven.
Good